The
noise levels requirements of 2.7 x 10
-5 in 1 hour and 1 ppm
in 30 days are very similar. These photometric noise requirements
impose:
- that the photon flux of the target stars is sufficiently high
to ensure that photon noise complies with the final noise
specifications, and
- that all other sources of noise remain well below photon noise in the
frequency range of interest.
The required photon fluxes can be translated into requirements on
optics collecting area and overall throughput described in the
following section.
Collecting area and
overall throughput
The above noise requirements, applied for stars with mV =
11, imply a photo-electron flux of the order 3.8 x105 sec-1
at this magnitude, which requires the use of an optical design with a
high overall throughput and a large effective collective area.
The overall optics + detector throughput can reasonably be expected of
the order of 0.6-0.7 in average over a bandpass of 500 nm, using high
quantum
efficiency detectors, such as thinned backside illuminated CCDs, as
well as efficient, optimally
coated optics. Under these assumptions, it can be calculated that an
effective total collecting area of 0.3 m2 is necessary to
yield the required photo-electron flux down to mV = 11.
Non photonic
sources of noise
We must ensure that additional sources of noise remain significantly
below photon noise. Until a full analysis of all environmental and
instrumental perturbations is carried out, we will specify that any
given source of noise must remain at least three times below photon
noise for stars in our prime sample of stars, i.e. down to mV=11
- 12. We provide below some hints concerning the expected two major
sources of perturbations, satellite jitter and thermal instability, but
a thorough study of all possible other sources of noise must be carried
out when designing the instrument and the mission during assessment,
phase-A and B1.
Satellite jitter introduces photometric noise, as drifts in the star's
position will change the illumination pattern of the detector, whose
pixels do not have exactly the same sensitivity. While a large fraction
of the induced noise can be calibrated out, as demonstrated by CoRoT
results, a residual noise will still be present, and impose pointing
stability requirements. At mV= 11 - 12, the photon noise
will be of the order of 2 x 10-4 per minute, and jitter
noise must remain about three times below this value, i.e. below 6 x 10-5
per minute. A detailed study, depending on the instrument design, is
necessary to figure out how this requirement translates into pointing
stability specifications, but order of magnitude estimates, as well as
experience gained with previous missions such as CoRoT, indicate that a
pointing stability of about 0.2 arcsec on timescales between one minute
and 15 hours will be needed.
Variation in temperature of both the telescopes and the CCD detectors
will lead, directly or indirectly, to changes in the apparent signal
level from the target stars. The top level requirement for these
perturbations is that the equivalent noise level induced by thermal
changes must be three times below the photon noise level across the
magnitude range of interest. While detailed a posteriori corrections can
drastically improve the resulting noise, as demonstrated by CoRoT
preliminary results, a full study taking into account the details of
the instrument design and environmental perturbations must be carried
out in order to specify clearly the thermal stability requirements.
Again, as a first estimate, we can take advantage of the CoRoT
experience, and require that the chip temperature must be stable to 0.1
K/hr, while a thermal stability of a few tenths of a K per day will be
required for the telescope structure.
Duration of
observations
The duration of the observations on each one of the two initial fields
needs to be longer than about three years,
so that at least three consecutive transits for Sun-Earth analogs can
be detected during the mission lifetime.
For the seismic analysis of the target stars, the total monitoring time
must be at least 5 months, so that the inversion of the
oscillation spectra is sufficiently
accurate to provide the star mass within a few percent in a reliable
way.
Duty cycle
The probability that N
transits of the same planet are observed is given by pN = (df)N,
where df is the fractional duty cycle of the instrument. In
order to achieve an 80% probability that all transits of a
three-transit sequence are observed, a duty cycle of 93% is needed,
ignoring gaps that are much shorter than individual transits. The
requirement for planet-finding is therefore that gaps which are longer
than a few tens of minutes do not occur over more then 7% of the time,
with a loss by gaps as small as 5% being desirable.
A similar requirement is also imposed for seismology. Gaps in the data
produce sidelobes in the power spectrum, which make mode identification
ambiguous. Periodic gaps in the data must be minimized, as they will
produce the most severe sidelobes in the power spectra. It can be shown
that periodic outages representing 5% of the total time produce aliases
with a power of about 1.5% of that of the real signal. Such sidelobes
are just acceptable, as they will remain within the noise for most of
the stars observed. It is therefore required that periodic data gaps
are below 5%, preferably 3%.
Non-periodic interruptions have a less catastrophic influence on the
power spectrum, and can therefore be tolerated at a higher level,
provided the time lost is compensated by a longer elapsed time for the
observation. Random gaps in the data representing a total of 10% of the
monitoring time yield sidelobes with a power lower than 1% of that of
the real signal, which will be adequate for this mission. The
requirement on random data gaps is therefore that they do not exceed
10% of the elapsed time.
Colour information
Intrinsic stellar variability due to activity or other stellar
phenomena can lead to variations of the light curves that are similar
to those produced by the transits of terrestrial exoplanets. Planet
occultations can be discriminated from these intrinsic variations if
several successive transits can be observed. In practice, planetary
transits are definitely discriminated from intrinsic stellar variations
only after three transits, so that the longest orbital period
detectable is in average between one third and one half of the total
monitoring time.
Light curves in several colours can improve significantly the
situation. Planetary transits indeed are achromatic, while all
intrinsic variability pattern show some degree of chromatism. Comparing
the depths and shapes of the candidate transits in several colours will
allow us to distinguish transits from stellar intrinsic variations.
Similarly, colour information will allow to discriminate against false
positives arising from of stellar configurations involving eclipsing
binaries, whose vast majority generates a chromatic signal. The level
of confidence for candidate transits will therefore be greatly enhanced
at first occurrence, hence increasing significantly the range of
reachable orbital periods.
In addition to the measurement of oscillation frequencies,
asteroseismology requires the identification (l,m) of the detected modes.
Knowing the l
identification for the dominant modes of each of the 100,000 bright
target stars of PLATO implies a significant reduction of the free
parameter space of stellar models and is a requirement to guarantee
successful seismic inference of their interior structure parameters and
ages.
For oscillations in the asymptotic frequency regime, the derivation of
frequency spacings suffices to identify the modes. For most
main-sequence stars excited by the kappa mechanism, when the modes do
not follow particular frequency patterns, the identification of l can be achieved by exploiting
the difference in amplitude and phase of the mode at different
wavelengths.
However, whatever the interest of colour information, we must not
compromise photon noise, which is the most important requirement of
this mission. The option to measure light curves in several colours
must be brought at negligible cost in terms of photon loss.
Time sampling
The duration of a transit of a
planet with
semi-majoraxis a and orbital
period P in front of a star
with
radius R* is given by
. For
true Earth analogs = 13 hours. More
generally,
the duration of a transit around a single star may last from about two
hours (a ``hot giant'' planet around a low-mass star) to over one day,
for planets on Jupiter-like orbits (5 AU distance). Planets in
the habitable zone, however, will cause transits lasting between 5
hours (around M stars) and 15 hours (for F stars), for equatorial
transits. Because individual transits have durations ≥ 2 hours, a
time sampling of about 10 - 15 minutes is in principle sufficient to
detect all types of transits, as well as to measure transit duration
and
period. However, a higher time resolution is needed in order to
accurately time ingress and egress of the planet transits for which the S/N in the light curve will be
sufficient. The accurate timing will
allow the detection of third bodies, which cause offsets in transit
times of a few seconds to about a minute, and will allow to solve
ambiguities among possible transit configurations through the
determination of ingress and egress time of the planet. In practice, a
time sampling of about 30 sec will be necessary to analyse in such
detail the detected transits.
The needed time sampling for the asteroseismology objectives can be
derived directly from the frequency interval we need to explore, which
is from 0.02 to 15 mHz. In order to reach 15 mHz, the time sampling
must
be at least twice this frequency, i.e.
of the order of 30 sec.
In
summary, a 30 sec sampling will be needed for the cool stars in the
bright sample of 100,000 stars for precise transit analysis and
asteroseismology, while a sampling of 10 minutes will be sufficient
to search for transits in the fainter sample of 400,000 stars. For the
small fraction of these
faint stars for which a transit will have been detected, a 30 sec
sampling will have to be applied.
Dynamical range
The planet search objectives of PLATO are based on the observation
ofstars as faint as mV= 13 - 14, but stars as bright
as mV= 4 - 5 also need to be monitored for the detection of
stellar
reflected light on planet atmospheres and also for astrometric
detection
of planets. Stars between mV=4 - 5 and mV= 11 -
12
also need to be
observed at a sufficient level for seismic analysis.