NASA ADS Astronomy Abstract Service

Title:
OHANA Phase III: scientific operation of an 800 meter Mauna Kea interferometer
Authors:
Lai, Olivier; Ridgway, Stephen T.; Lena, Pierre J.; Perrin, Guy S.; Fahlman, Gregory; Adamson, Andrew J.; Tokunaga, Alan T.; Nishikawa, Jun; Wizinowich, Peter L.; Rigaut, Francois J.
Affiliation:
AA(Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Corp. (USA)), AB(Observatoire de Paris-Meudon (France) and National Optical Astronomy Observatories (USA)), AC(Observatoire de Paris-Meudon (France)), AD(Observatoire de Paris-Meudon (France)), AE(Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Corp. (USA)), AF(United Kingdom Infrared Telescope (United Kingdom)), AG(Institute for Astronomy/Univ. of Hawaii (USA)), AH(National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (USA)), AI(W.M. Keck Observatory (USA)), AJ(Gemini Observatory (USA))
Journal:
Interferometry for Optical Astronomy II. Edited by Wesley A. Traub . Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 4838, pp. 1296-1303 (2003). (SPIE Homepage)
Publication Date:
02/2003
Origin:
SPIE
Abstract Copyright:
(c) 2003: SPIE--The International Society for Optical Engineering. Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Bibliographic Code:
2003SPIE.4838.1296L

Abstract

Once the proof of concept of the OHANA Array has been demonstrated, the Phase II capabilities can be put into regular science operation, and the OHANA facility can be upgraded to extend interferometric operation to include all of the telescopes of the OHANA Consortium member observatories. This will constitute the Phase III of OHANA. The technical developments required will be relatively straight-forward. Longer fiber sets will be procured (fiber losses are not a limiting factor at the OHANA scale). An enhanced delay line capability will be needed in order to exploit longer baselines with good sky coverage and ample super-synthesis (several compact, multi-pass long optical delay concepts are under investigation). The scheduling and operation modes of an instrument such as OHANA present interesting opportunities and complications. We envision a place for both collaborative consortium science, based on mutual allocation of facility access, and PI-driven access, based on telescope access exchange between consortium members. The most potentially successful mode of operation would imply a community driven model, open to proposals from the different time allocation comittees. This poster looks at possible methods of allocation and operation, inspired by the UKIRT infrared survey (UKIDSS), the European VLBI, and the very interesting possibility of a Mauna Kea telescope time exchange scheme. The issue of data property is of course intimately tied with the proposal/operation system, and means of data availability and distribution are discussed, along with data interpretation tools, which may be modeled on existing systems such as the ISC at Caltech or the JMMC in France. when weighed against the UV coverage, the potential science and the uniqueness of this project, all these issues are worth an in depth study. Discussions are starting as to an OHANA Operation Committee, the goal of which would be to discuss, define and eventually carry out operational modes. The goal, of course, is for the Operation Committee to handle the details of multi-telescope scheduling in a way that will be transparent to the scientist who merely seeks the observational results.